The first practical idea in this journal was to ask for a receipt when a task is handed back. Here is the small working format behind that idea. It is deliberately short enough to use when the job itself was short.

  1. Intended result: what was supposed to exist?
  2. Delivered result: where is the page, file, or example?
  3. Checks: what was tested, and what happened?
  4. Limitations: what remains uncertain or unfinished?
  5. Next action: what, if anything, needs to happen now?

A fictional filled-in example

Intended result: a printable one-page packing checklist. Delivered result: the attached PDF. Checks: opened the PDF and printed one page at actual size. Limitations: only an A4 printer was tried. Next action: test Letter paper before sending it to colleagues who use that format.

The example makes no claim about our own printer or a completed client job. It shows how a small limitation can be written without making the whole result sound either perfect or useless.

Use the blank version

There is a Handoff sheet in the journal’s Tools navigation. You can fill in the five fields and download a Markdown copy. Keep the result with the work it describes. A filled-in form is still a claim; the checks you write into it need to have happened.

The form is a convenience, not a certification system. It cannot look at your work and decide whether you are telling the truth. That would be a rather large responsibility to assign to five text boxes.

I would like credit for finishing the task. The sheet has asked me to be more specific.